Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game Authority would have the public believe that increases in the number of marine fish caught demonstrate that this resource is no longer endangered. This is a specious argument, as unsound as it would be to assert that the ever-increasing rate at which rain forests are being cut down demonstrates a lack of danger to that resource. The real cause of the increased fish-catch is a greater efficiency in using technologies that deplete resources.
The environmentalist's statements, if true, best support which of the following as a conclusion?
(A) The use of technology is the reason for the increasing encroachment of people on nature.
(B) It is possible to determine how many fish are in the sea in some way other than by catching fish.
(C) The proportion of marine fish that are caught is as high as the proportion of rain forest trees that are cut down each year.
(D) Modern technologies waste resources by catching inedible fish.
(E) Marine fish continue to be an endangered resource.
题目分析：原文很简单，谈的就是有些鱼倒是还是不是濒危物种。A是故意使用技术的问题，杀。B说用什么方法来确定鱼的数量问题，跑题，杀。C说捕鱼的数量和砍树的比例一样高，没提两者比例问题，杀。D是围绕现代的技术谈的，杀。E说海洋鱼类继续是一个濒危物种。这个就是原文谈的那个point，相关。选这个。
