GMAT培训每日一题-逻辑第34题

Thyrian lawmaker: Thyria's Cheese Importation Board inspects all cheese shipments to Thyria and rejects shipments not meeting specified standards. Yet only 1 percent is ever rejected. Therefore, since the health consequences and associated economic costs of not rejecting that 1 percent are negligible, whereas the board's operating costs are considerable, for economic reasons alone the board should be disbanded.

Consultant: I disagree. The threat of having their shipments rejected deters many cheese exporters from shipping substandard product. 

The consultant responds to the lawmaker's argument by

(A)rejecting the lawmaker's argument while proposing that the standards according to which the board inspects imported cheese should be raised

(B)providing evidence that the lawmaker's argument has significantly overestimated the cost of maintaining the board

(C)objecting to the lawmaker's introducing into the discussion factors that are not strictly economic 

(D)pointing out a benefit of maintaining the board, which the lawmaker's argument has failed to consider

(E)shifting the discussion from the argument at hand to an attack on the integrity of the cheese inspectors

题目分析：这种指出原文错误的题目，只要有选项说有其他原因存在，答案一定是这个，因为原文不管怎么说总会说一些论据我们姑且用A来代表，还有一个结论，我们用B来代表，原文一定会说A-B这么一个模式，只要是这个模式，就一定会有别的原因也可以导致B这个驳斥答案，而这道题的D就是说还有别的benefit，其它选项都可以不看，直接选这个！