作者：英吉
In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than 9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats went out of business between 1992 and 1996.
题目分析：今天有急事，用蒙的方法做一个，问假设，就证明出题者认为原文逻辑推理不严密，少一个条件，希望把正确答案填到原文的推理中使推理变得严密一些，如果是肯定句那么给我的感觉就是“我们干了什么”，如果是否定句我的感觉就是“我们还没干什么”，既然正确答案是原文缺失的一个条件，感觉应该是“我们还没干什么”，答案应该是个否定句，A留着。B杀，C留着。D留着。E杀。剩下这三个那个和原文推理的内容沾边（因为答案是原文缺失的一个条件），A感觉说的是个推理，B和D感觉都说的是个事实，选A。不建议各位都这么做，今天有点事，偶尔用一下这种方法，不推荐大量使用！
