GWD GMAT

请扫描下方二维码关注GWD微信

微信二维码

博智LSAT

请扫描下方二维码关注微信公众号

微信二维码

博智教育

请扫描下方二维码关注博智教育微信

微信二维码

GMAT培训 每日一题-逻辑第83题

博智教育 GMAT培训 GMAT每日一题

Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites. 
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) These winemakers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
(B) Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reaction. 
(C) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
(D) Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
(E) Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these winemakers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

题目分析:原文说如果你对那种物质过敏但是还愿意喝酒那就喝那些不向酒里添加那些物质的酒商生产的酒就可以了。A说酒商能不能在不加任何危险物质的情况下复制那种物质的保存效果,是不是能有保存效果不是原文谈的主题,杀。B说不是所有形式的s都有过敏反应,比较远,杀。C说wine是s这种物质应用的唯一饮料,扯得远了,杀。D说除了s,别的物质怎么样,范围完全张冠李戴,杀。E说你喝那些不人工加s的酒前提是这种酒自己在天然的条件下会不会也会产生那些让人过敏的物质s,显然是把其中一个口子给堵上,原文说的那个口子是加进去的s,这个选项说不可能自然产生,就把自然产生这个口子堵上了,这个假设常见的方式,就是把别的可能性去掉。

博智教育 GMAT培训 GMAT每日一题
在线咨询